Attorneys
Practices
Locations
About C&G
Diversity
Pro Bono
Careers
News and Events
Search
Antitrust & Competition
Antitrust & Competition
Antitrust & Competition Litigation
Antitrust & Competition Regulatory & Enforcement
Merger Clearance & Compliance
Corporate
Corporate
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance & Disclosure
Executive Compensation
Family Office Practice
Mergers & Acquisitions
Oil & Gas Transactions
Private Equity & Venture Capital
Private Funds
Digital Currency & Blockchain Technology
Employment Law
Employment Law
Employment Law – France
Employment Law – U.S.
U.S. Employment Investigations
Intellectual Property & Technology
Litigation & Arbitration
Litigation & Arbitration
Appellate Practice
Arbitration & Mediation
Aviation Litigation
Bankruptcy Litigation & Counseling
Class Action Defense
Commercial Litigation
Directors & Officers Litigation
Insurance
Products Liability, Torts, Class Actions
Professional Liability
Real Estate Litigation
Securities Litigation
Privacy & Data Security
Real Estate
Regional Practices
Regional Practices
Africa Practice
Israel Practice
Korea Practice
Tax
Tax
Corporate Tax
Private Clients
Tax Litigation
White Collar Defense & Regulation
White Collar Defense & Regulation
Criminal Defense
FCPA/Anti-Corruption
Internal Investigations
Regulatory Compliance
Regulatory Enforcement
View All Practices
Search
Attorneys
Practices
Locations
Diversity
Pro Bono
Careers
News and Events
Home
Publications
Rethinking Trademark Enforcement Strategy after B&B Hardware v. Hargis
Rethinking Trademark Enforcement Strategy after B&B Hardware v. Hargis
Home
Publications
Rethinking Trademark Enforcement Strategy after B&B Hardware v. Hargis
Rethinking Trademark Enforcement Strategy after B&B Hardware v. Hargis
Rethinking Trademark Enforcement Strategy after B&B Hardware v. Hargis
May 27, 2015
Publication:
C&G Alert
Related Attorneys:
Karen H Bromberg
Related Practices:
Intellectual Property and Technology
Office:
New York
Search